| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cpt Cosmic
   |
Posted - 2008.05.07 06:56:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Cpt Cosmic on 07/05/2008 07:01:55
so you want a bubble + a passive tanked drake, sitting next to this emp thing camping a gate and then snipe the **** out of your target with the rest of you gang?
no thx alot, you already have 2 different kinds of bubbles you can use to stop people warping away from gates. we dont need another mechanics to buff camps more (actually it needs a BIG nerf), you already got your buff with the introduction of the heavy interdictors. and we dont want any more sniper blobs lol |
Cpt Cosmic
|
Posted - 2008.05.07 14:49:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Cpt Cosmic on 07/05/2008 14:55:07
pilots are adapting to a situation, called blob and camps and you cant get your kill because of that? so you want penalize those who adapt to your lame game play of no skill killing lone people with your epeen gang @gates that just pass and do nothing bad to you just because you want to do bad things to other people? and btw we dont need another must have module for pvp, we already have a mwd/scram, you would force people just to fit another module (cap injector). instead of suggestion something to make it just easier for you (actually this is a bad idea, this would make every bc and smaller defensless), you could adapt to them and put a cloaked remote repping gang with gallente and minnie recon on the other side and when he mwds back to the gate he will have a nice surprise.
your idea is like I would suggest a high slot module that freezes every hostile ships if the hostile ships outnumber me cause it is not fair to be outnumbered. would you like to have somethink like this in game?
|
Cpt Cosmic
|
Posted - 2008.05.08 05:19:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
stuff
lol I am a troll cause I am telling true stuff XD I even gave you an idea how to catch those nanos u cant get.
U ARE JUST LAZY and want to make it easier for you.
|
Cpt Cosmic
|
Posted - 2008.05.08 06:39:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
I am obviously a lazy guy without arguments
proof is in your first post:
1. you stated people dont like nanos and I am sure you are one of those cause otherwise if you would not be lazy you would adapt and not post useless ideas in the forum to make it easier for you.
2. then you stated that stationary targets had no chance against nano gangs what is absolutely not true, because a spidertanking bs gang will always be superior.
3. you want to make people defensless, another proof you are lazy, otherwise you would hunt them down.
4.you have no arguments about me beeing a troll and no real arguments about your "good" idea, you described your own problems and want to punish people adapting but I have already 4 against you that are valid 
time to make some efforts and use braincells 
|
Cpt Cosmic
|
Posted - 2008.05.08 08:04:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
False. I argued that there needs to be more risk using nanoships.
there already is a risk of loosing a very valuable ship by being caught and maybe much more with implants.
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
No I did not say stationary targets "had no chance". I said it was too easy to just burn back to the gate, even if you get webbed (unless you really mess up) you can jump out. And no, it is not always possible to tackle again on the other side (eg. low-sec)
you did stealthy in your description of your lazyness.
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
Ridiculous claim, nowhere did I state that I want "to make people defensless". And since the premise is false, so is your conclusion, dear troll.
a ship without cap is defensless and forcing poeple to use more cookie cutter setups is your lazyness.
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
The fact that you do not recognize the arguments does not make them non-existent. And the last comment is just pure irony.
yeah it is irony that even after you made an epic fail you still persist in being right
you are still lazy nothing changed
|
Cpt Cosmic
|
Posted - 2008.05.08 09:37:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
Heh, I should know better to argue with a troll. You just don't have a clue whom you're arguing with.
I am arguing with a lazy guy, and lazy guys are fast food for trollz 
|
| |
|